NTSB Report on Big Dig Collapse

Last summer’s death of Milena del Valle under 26 tons of concrete that fell from the ceiling of a Big Dig tunnel raises a complex web of potential liability. I’ve posted about this over the past year as investigators pore through a mountain of evidence to fix the cause of the ceiling’s collapse. See Big Dig, Big Liability, Massachusetts Sues for Big Dig Negligence, and Big Dig Litigation Update. The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) recently identified use of the incorrect epoxy as the culprit. In the words of an NTSB member “[i]t’s kind of ironic in a $14 billion project . . . About $1.50 per anchor is what ended up bringing the ceiling down.”

According to the NTSB this is what happened. Bechtel/Parsons Brinkerhoff, which oversaw all Big Dig construction, reviewed the epoxy specifications prepared by Gannet Fleming, one of six subcontractors and suppliers who worked on the ceiling. The NTSB says that Bechtel/Parsons did not consider the fast-set epoxy’s long-term strength. The epoxy’s supplier, Powers Fasteners, stated in project documentation–“in the fine print”–that fast-set epoxy was not for long term use but apparently no one acted on this language. A Powers spokeswoman says that Powers supplied its standard-set epoxy, an order valued at $1,287, and assumed it was used. Big Dig contractors were aware that the bolts supporting the massive concrete ceiling panels were slipping and devised theories as to the cause, but the nature of the epoxy securing the bolts in their holes was not among them. Despite knowledge that these bolts were loosening the project’s overseers and the tunnel’s managers never instituted regular inspection of them. Reporting on the NTSB’s findings The Boston Globe stated “[t]here were no regular inspections in the more than three and a half years between the completion of the tunnel and the collapse . . . But after the disaster, investigators found that other ceiling panels were in imminent danger of falling.”

Expect more details over the coming months as other investigations continue, including one by Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley to determine whether to file criminal charges in connection with del Valle’s death.

8 thoughts on “NTSB Report on Big Dig Collapse

  1. I don’t even know how I ended up here, but I thought this post was great.
    I do not know who you are but certainly you’re
    going to a famous blogger if you are not already 😉
    Cheers!

  2. I do not even know how I finished up right here,
    but I believed this publish was once great. I don’t recognize who you’re
    but certainly you’re going to a famous blogger should you aren’t already.
    Cheers!

  3. I’ve been surfing online more than 4 hours today, yet I never
    found any interesting article like yours. It is pretty worth enough
    for me. In my view, if all website owners and bloggers made good content as
    you did, the web will be much more useful than ever before.

  4. This article is really cool. I have bookmarked it. Do you allow guest posting on your blog ?

    I can provide hi quality posts for you. Let me know.

  5. Good blog you have here.. It’s hard to find good quality writing like yours these days.
    I seriously appreciate people like you! Take care!!

  6. I used to be suggested this web site through my cousin. I am
    now not sure whether this post is written via him as no
    one else recognise such specified approximately my problem.
    You are amazing! Thanks!

  7. I’m quite fascinated and pleased with randomly surfing links to teacher’s names leading to an interesting blog.

    I had never took the time to trace the failures of public facilities – this web of interests conflicts with many; no wonder lawsuits take forever.

    It seems like there’s always private benefit abused whenever a corporation wins a government contract. I’m under the impression that as long as the job is done, what’s left unspent in the contact is a handsome profit, so quite often, minimal effort is put on the project on its various aspects.

    Such as the inspections which were lacking on the bolts, or even the loose standards set on the weights they could hold. Truth is, as long as they feel that they can get away with it, they will do it. After all, those tests do cost a bit, though the decision to use inadequate bolts is beyond my rationale.

    Whoops, I got carried away. I meant use this post as the most convenient method for me to contact you, and tell you, that the course materials links are not working properly under the administrator heading, and that the FAQs link is semi-functional. It reveals a list of useful questions, but only offers the answer to the first one on the top of the page of that window regardless of which question you click on.

    Well that’s that – and no, I’m actually not enrolled in any one of your classes… yet – but keep me updated.

Comments are closed.