A number of people have sent links (here is one) to YouTube videos of the Tasering incident during John Kerry’s speech at University of Florida. Viewing it on these videos it seems the police may have overreacted in subduing the young man, but it is very hard to see what is going on. The victim was more interested in making a scene than in having Kerry answer any of his questions, which of course is not a reason to hit him with the Taser. As he is escorted from the hall more officers get involved in subduing him and they use the Taser while he is on the ground. In the first video I watched the Taser is neither seen nor heard but the video linked above provides clear audio evidence of the Taser. The incident bears some resemblance to last November’s Tasering incident at a UCLA library. To my viewing the UCLA incident, in which campus police repeatedly used a Taser on a young man who was leaving the library after and ID check, is more disturbing. The UCLA student was complying with police directives, while this UF student was struggling with police removing him from a hall for disrupting Kerry’s appearance. Kerry’s ghostly voice-over is strangely passive throughout. Again, I’m not agreeing that the student deserved to be Tasered for the disruption. Police may have been warranted in removing him from the hall–I haven’t looked into the circumstances of Kerry’s speech and the student’s presence there–and if so, they can use appropriate force to do so.
Sphere: Related ContentArchives
- ▶2010 (49)
- ▼March (6)
- ▶February (24)
- News from the Base
- Explanation Given
- Class Act
- Ghosts?
- Is Ginga Vitis Related to Vitas Gerulaitis?
- $.70 a Song
- Treaty Draft Makes ISPs Liable for Illegal Content
- "Astonishing" Criminal Liability for YouTube Video
- Louis Vuitton Wins Again
- Love That Nasty Salmon
- My Office Minutes Are From 2 to 2:05
- Ski Jumping
- Broadband's Narrow Base
- Explanation Wanted
- "On Learning Italian"
- Tergiversate
- Off to the Great Acorn Cache in the Sky
- Playing the China Card
- 'Aints No More
- Deployed
- Judicial Restraint
- Google Street View in the News
- Joys of Post-College Travel Abroad
- Being a Second-Semester Senior Means . . .
- ▶January (19)
- And Yet Again
- Look Me In the i
- Duty to Rescue
- Why There Will Always Be Plumbers
- The Scope of NYT v Sullivan
- Newsworthiness and Privacy
- This Angle I Missed
- iPad, Therefore iAm
- Mine is "this is not my password"
- More Threatening Than Underwear Bombers
- RIAA Damages Reduced
- There He Goes Again, Again
- There He Goes Again
- Cool Hand Brett
- You Be the Ethics Board
- Blame Me. I'm From Massachusetts*
- What We Do For Fun
- Start the Year with Scones
- Why No One Talks to Me at Parties
- ▶2009 (185)
- ▶December (6)
- ▶November (12)
- ▶October (24)
- Facebook Sign-In
- Copyright Enforcement Run Amok
- What Was He Thinking?
- SAD and Blue
- Law Career Blues
- Case Prep
- It Seemed Like a Good Idea at the Time
- The Nadir News Network
- Mandatory Sentencing
- Retail's Evolution
- Looking Back from Law School
- Changed Contractual Expectations
- I Never Metadata I Didn't Like*^^
- Take a Hike
- Life in a Corporate Law Firm . . .
- Ethics Articles
- Ugh
- Google Trial Begins
- Tenenbaum Postscript
- Being Real
- Another One Bites the Dust
- Non-Producers
- By the Numbers
- Thoughtful Follow-up
- ▶September (5)
- ▶August (11)
- ▶July (13)
- ▶June (16)
- ▶May (16)
- Letting a Sleeping Dog Lie
- Pollen, Pollen Everywhere
- Belated Post on Pirate Bay Guilty Verdict
- Google and Orphan Books
- Seeing the Stars
- Brilliant
- Peat Bomb
- Summer Begins
- The Last 10%
- State of the Profession
- Just a matter of time . . .
- Real Crackers
- Military graduation
- End Notes
- Don't Forget
- Quality Work
- ▶April (18)
- From Twitter to Quitter
- Internet Law Sampler
- Mental-Health Break
- Fun at Fenway
- This is dedicated* . . .
- I'm Concentrating in Law and Perendination
- Why Dogs Like Maine
- The Rule of Seven
- "two idiots with a video camera"
- Kiss Tax-Free Internet Sales Goodbye?
- AFC Users
- Considering Law School
- Piracy Postscript
- Piracy on Parade
- Internet 101
- April, the Quiet Month
- Reality Isn't That Simple
- Scary Outside
- ▶March (24)
- Food Taster Needed?
- Sign of Spring
- Grim Career News: One-Stop Shopping
- Cheats
- Malware Aid
- Toxic Data
- Job Discrimination Cases Tough to Win
- Dinner at the Country Club
- Poolside in Eff El A
- Dissolution Blues
- No More Endorsements
- Repo Madness II
- §230 Debate
- Juror #131
- Rich on Excess
- Repo Madness
- Open Source 1, Proprietary Software 0
- Maryland Protects Anonymity Online
- Will the SSTP Gather Momentum?
- Music's Future
- Dow[n]
- Missing Notes
- Hiding in Plain Sight
- Ahead of its Time
- ▶February (23)
- Vanderwarker's Pantheon
- AFC on iPhone
- Music Industry Panel Debate
- Civility on the Upswing?
- Regulating Intermediaries
- CMLP on Doninger v Niehoff
- About-Face
- Pirate Bay on Trial
- Did you Know?
- ISTTF Report
- Shameless Nepotistic Plug
- No Expectation of Privacy
- Speech versus Privacy
- Gated Online Communities
- CMLP on Juicy Campus's Demise
- Limits on Limited Liability?
- Critique of Herring
- A Gun for Everyone
- Scenes From Basic Training
- She Got Game
- A long way from home
- Web Liability Without Section 230
- Bad Times
- ▶January (17)
- Recover the Bonuses
- The Emperor Exposed
- Fresh Air
- COPA Dead
- Update on Kentucky Domain-Name Seizure
- No Constitutional Right to High School Sports
- Awaiting Instructions
- Complete This Triad
- Schneier on Impersonation
- Not Ready to Tap Dance
- How Not to Serve
- Ghost Mall
- O Tenenbaum
- Year in Review
- Music Industry Updates
- Surgery + 17
- Happy New Year, Belated
- ▶2008 (159)
- ▶December (15)
- ▶November (10)
- ▶October (12)
- ▶September (16)
- Kentucky's Domain-Name Grab
- No Leadership
- Internet Down Under
- By Any Other Name
- Other Shoe Drops on RIAA
- Piles o' Paper
- Civil Rights Cartoon
- More on the T Hack
- Brooks Editorial
- McCain's Judgment II
- Potter Lexicon Loses Fair Use Claim
- Two Years
- Time for Some Campaignin'
- Starting Over
- Web Sites and the ADA
- Is McCain Serious?
- ▶August (11)
- ▶July (10)
- ▶June (14)
- ▶May (19)
- Advice for summer associates
- Middlebury Graduation
- Why Not Give a Bible?
- Classic Lawyer's Mistake
- 3L's
- NY Online Sales Tax Fallout
- Judge Admits Error in RIAA Case
- Pomp & Circumstance
- Isn't It Ironic
- Classroom Distractions
- PC2: Potential Convert
- PC: Problems Compounded
- Wiki project post-mortem
- Being secure versus feeling secure
- Today's Cognitive Dissonance
- The pirate mind
- Groundhog Year
- Amazon Challenges "Amazon Tax"
- Once a week
- ▶April (5)
- ▶March (13)
- ▶February (22)
- Wikileaks is Back
- Predator Fear
- Echoes of Yahoo!-China?
- Quality Conversations
- Flying garage
- More on Wikileaks
- Get Out the Checkbooks
- Trade Polls
- Quiet Concerns
- Wikileaks.org
- Facebook follow-up
- Snow!
- No explanation
- Net Neutrality Bill
- Facebook Two-Step
- Cell phone use leads to employer settlement
- What Was He Thinking? Department
- Hacking the Great Firewall
- Nice try, but . . .
- Found Time
- Focus on the ISPs
- Real Player Warning
- ▶January (12)
- ▶2007 (205)
- ▶December (12)
- ▶November (14)
- Universal Digital Library
- Rumplestilts-berg
- Limited Vista from my Windows
- The Purpose of Law School II
- Court to Consider D.C. Gun Ban
- The Sun Always Shines II . . .
- The Sun Always Shines . . .
- To P2P or Not to P2P
- Cost of Filtering
- Lose-Lose
- No Factual Statement, No Defamation
- Drowning by Any Other Name
- BigLaw Economics
- Thinking of Law School? Read This
- ▶October (21)
- Dubious Disclaimers
- Georgia Teenager Freed
- Red Sox 2, Rockies 1
- OiNK Spin
- Lawyer's Life
- Sox Dance Into World Series
- Timbuk2 and Target
- OiNK Shut Down
- RIAA v Thomas Post-Mortem
- Like Chalk Across a Blackboard
- Woe is the Sox
- "A New Life Phase"
- The Constant Eye of the Internet
- RIAA Wins Jury Verdict
- CLE 6, NYY 4
- Reboot if there's a mistrial
- Old Speck
- Summer's Over
- Women and the Law
- More on the iPhone
- Apple Apostasy
- ▶September (19)
- To Be* or Not to Be*
- Legal Careers
- Not Covered By LSAT Prep
- UF Taser Incident
- Suit Dropped
- They Did Walk This Way
- Janus-Faced
- Liability and Web 2.0
- Ordinary People, Extraordinary Evil
- Anti-censorship
- The Human Cost
- Video Op-Ed
- Trending Up or Down?
- China and the Internet
- Law School Blogs
- DOJ Opposes Neutral Net
- Faux Ingenue
- Pat on the Back
- Life's Good for the Lawyers
- ▶August (8)
- ▶July (14)
- NTSB Report on Big Dig Collapse
- E-Commerce Top Ten
- Mission Not Accomplished
- More Cause for Hopelessness
- Logorrhea Lowdown
- Praise for Salaried PDs
- More Bike Trip Pics
- Cause for Hopelessness
- Democrat$ vs. Republican'ts
- Do As I Say, Not As I Do
- The Undead
- Gills Gone Wild
- Everyone Loves a Parade
- Three Bike Tales
- ▶June (15)
- Facing Number Hill
- Lost pants, lost suit
- And Wayne Newton as Secretary of State
- Schneier on Irrational Responses
- Pants Suit Follies
- Yahoo! Drops the Other Shoe
- Yahoo's Grumpy Shareholders
- A Stupid and Sad Suit
- Amero Gets New Trial
- The Price of Speech
- Cornwell Fights Sachs's Attacks
- China's Information Duality
- White Pine Down
- 2nd Circuit to FCC: Get F***ed
- Benefits of Police Training
- ▶May (19)
- Have a Heart
- Brink of Extinction
- A Good Idea at the Time
- Wi-Fi Free Ride is Michigan Crime
- The 59th Street (Toll)Bridge Song
- Thank you . . .
- The Closer
- AG Declares War on IP Infringement
- Amateurism vs. Expertise
- FAQs
- Going Mainstream
- Net Neutrality and Broadband
- Cops Drop Cartoon Caper Charges
- The French Inhale is Rated X
- Hopper at the MFA
- End-of-Semester Hijinks
- Summer Twilight, Almost
- Two Schools of Thought
- In the home stretch
- ▶April (12)
- ▶March (16)
- ▶February (29)
- Fudd hunts wabbit*
- Speech, Chilled
- Porn Conviction Causes Outrage
- Sad Day
- Egypt Imprisons Blogger
- From the iTunes Playlist
- Color Me Gruntled
- Today's Deep Thought
- "Wikiality"
- The Purpose of Law School
- What Worth is Wikipedia?
- Do-Over Ordered in Weis Malpractice Trial
- Supreme Court Tosses Punitive Damage Award
- This is More Like It
- Embrace the Gray*
- MySpace Negligence Suit Dismissed
- Still No Phish Jokes
- Internet and Crime
- Wanted: Recipe for Smoked Bass
- Elif Shafak
- Beinart Article
- Good Government or Gotcha II
- Collateral Damage
- From the Readers' Mailbag
- Bomb-Scare Settlement
- Good Government or Gotcha?
- Cartoon Consequences
- Toll of War
- Dumb Clients
- ▶January (26)
- It Pays to Specialize
- A Sorry Tale
- Say "Cheese!"
- 9th Circuit Rejects Kahle Claim
- NJ Recognizes Privacy Right
- Just Asking For It
- Keeping the Moat Up
- Vista Service Pack -1.0
- Not On Company Time
- Raising Cost of Online Sales
- Music Without Shackles
- Opting Out
- You've Been YouTubed
- Branford Bike Wildfire
- MySpace Sued for Sexual Assaults
- NETeller Exits U.S. Market
- Neteller Founders Arrested
- What's the Wikipedia Entry for "Quality?"
- RIAA v Santangelo Default Judgment
- Judge's Error
- Climate Change
- Is a Hug Evidence of Bad Faith?
- South Korea to Require Internet Users' Real Names
- Steve Jobs to Cisco: "Like iCare"
- "cRANKy"??
- Judicial Pay Raises
- ▶2006 (86)
- ▶December (27)
- AllofMP3.com–Is That All You’ve Got?
- That Holiday Spirit
- Worth Reading
- It's Beginning to Look a Lot Like March
- iTunes: Up or Down
- AllofMP3.com Lives Yet
- Don't Know Much About History . . .
- Lawsuits on the Family Plan
- New Copyright-Monitoring System
- Peer Enforcement
- You, Wonderful You
- Brief Hiatus
- Like Coals to Newcastle
- Is That a Manatee in Your Pocket?
- iTunes iNtrouble?
- Look in the Mirror
- Imprisoned Journalists
- By June the Tunes Will Grace One Million Zunes
- Do-It-Yourself Lawyering
- More: Smoking and Employment
- Less is More
- Money Talking
- Information Wants to Be Free, Unless it Doesn't
- Smoking Ban, Weight Tax, and Bias
- Do Laptops Impede Classroom Learning?
- Justices Vote For Bong Hits
- Freeman to release new film online
- ▶November (26)
- One Small Step for BitTorrent,
- At-Will At Work
- None Of MP3.com
- Vanishing Trials
- Britain to Reject Copyright Extension
- Massachusetts Sues for Big Dig Negligence
- Online Gaming Smorgasbord
- UMG Sues MySpace
- Lydia Cacho
- Borat's Easy Targets
- Police Misconduct
- COPA Trial Expert's Report II
- $100 million here, $100 million there
- Fashion Police
- A Sandwich By Any Other Name
- Garden Guy Goads Gays--and Profits
- COPA Trial Expert's Report
- Worldwide Press Freedom Index
- Zune Tune Lacks Harmony
- Google Goes Generic?
- Some of God's Creatures
- Microsoft-Universal Royalty Agreement
- Quality of Military Recruits
- Have It Your Way
- The Road to Disaster
- The Joke's On Us
- ▶October (19)
- Too Much Information
- Why Buy the Cow?
- P2P = People to Prison
- COPA Trial: Stay Tuned
- Judicial Activism
- Skilling: $205 million/month
- Employment Milestone
- You're Not It
- No-Show Jurors
- Prohibition? What was Prohibition?
- Plaintiff: I gambled and lost
- Whose Data Is It, Anyway?
- Privacy Calls
- One L
- The Cup Runneth Over
- Dictionary Detour
- Hot Coffee, reheated
- Quiet Enjoyment
- Fastow: No Mercy
- ▶September (14)
- ▶December (27)
- ▶2010 (49)
Audio RSS Feed
Blogroll
-
RSS Links
Login
Register | Login
3 Comments
I consider Florida home, so when I saw this it was very hard to imagine. My friends attending the University of Florida know the student and most of them support what he was trying to do, although they recognize he is the typical class clown.
The thing that I don’t understand in all this , is why was there so much use of excessive force. I understand he made a scene but to be surrounded by so many officers and to also have to be attacked with a taser, it just doesn’t make sense to me. I thought it was also interesting that it was university police on campus. Maybe they felt that they needed to make sure that no one else got any funny ideas.
I feel like the trust that my friends had with the University of Florida has been crushed. How does an act of such violence to one person get equalized. I feel like you should be able to speak out your opinion anywhere and especially when you are on a college campus. You have just taken the first amendment and made everyone on your campus question the principles of the university.
I know he didn’t want his question to be answered but in our society which politician actually answers the questions. They tend to go around the facts and sound good doing it. You can’t blame them though, they are trained by their committees very well.
Having already seen the UCLA library taser video footage, I thought I already knew what I was getting into when I watched this video. But, what I just saw has evoked more than a mere disappointment with the UF Police Department.
Firstly, the young man stepped up to the microphone with nothing but a book and his own thoughts. Although he proceeded quite aggressively to ask Mr. Kerry his series of “questions,” he did not say or do anything that directly threatened Mr. Kerry physically. He simply stayed in his place and tried to make his point (but not too well). If he had proceeded to pull out a gun or some type of threatening weapon, I would have encouraged the police to do anything possible to subdue this man. But nothing even remotely close to that happened. All of a sudden, though, you see several officers come out of no where. When they begin to push him around and grab his arms forcefully is when they crossed the line. At one point, the gentleman puts his hands up and says “help” and stops protesting!
As soon as the officers start tasering the young man, I felt this sort of rage building up. Then I began to think about it more. It’s frightening to see the men and women who are supposed to be protecting us use this unnecessary force against an innocent activist. That makes me more worrysome that our seemingly democratic society is becoming more and more radical, scooping away the opposition to jail cells for being opinionated. The appropriate force should always be weighed with the potential danger of the person to be controlled. Unfortunately, the officers’ scale was off – they used too much.
Luis wrote:
“The thing that I don’t understand in all this , is why was there so much use of excessive force. I understand he made a scene but to be surrounded by so many officers and to also have to be attacked with a taser, it just doesn’t make sense to me.”
Kerry’s a US Senator and former Presidential candidate. Many police, and I’m sure private guards, are common procedure at a public speaking engagement.
I agree about the excessive force argument against the police, they probably should’ve just thrown the student out on his ass which would’ve stopped his disruptions without weapons.
One thing to question is the skill of these officers and others who have trigger finger – why can’t they just handcuff people and drag them to the ground (or police car)? Police would have a lot less bad PR to worry about if they didn’t carry around all that ammunition, and didn’t use it at the drop of a hat.
Post a Comment