Comments on: Solitary

By: David Randall

David Randall — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 16:18:19 +0000

In Massachusetts solitary confinement is imposed by prison officials for violation of prison rules. It is not imposed by a court as part of a criminal sentence. I think a sentence of 36 years to solitary confinement could be challenged in itself as cruel and unusual punishment.

By: Alex

Alex — Fri, 28 Mar 2008 13:12:30 +0000

my question, maybe someone knows, isn’t solitary confinement used as punishment after you are in prison. I’m not sure if using the evidence from these prisoners initial case is useful when evaluating how harsh their solitary confinement is. There has to be more to the story, something had occurred inside the prison to cause them to go to confinement.

By: Karim

Karim — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:07:01 +0000

Kind of a side note I would like to add to what I said earlier.

Some argue that this is worse than the death penalty. Can’t some also argue that the costs to keep these prisoners in solitary confinement are much higher than executing them?

I don’t mean to sound heartless and this does not represent my opinion about capital punishment.

By: Geetika

Geetika — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 22:00:52 +0000

When i said earlier that in solitary confinement prisoners donot have the chance to reflect or repent, I meant that they will be able to reflect in a much better way about what they did, if instead of being kept in solitary confinement where they just stare at the 4 walls around them, they are made to work in special areas, which compels them to think about their crime and feel sorry for the misery that they have caused to others.

By: zebra33

zebra33 — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 21:40:15 +0000

I must say I’m rather shocked at the lack of compassion in many of the posts. I would like to suggest to those that “think these prisoners deserve the way they are being treated” to read up on two topics, the first being prison conditions and the second being the number of innocent people in jails, particularly those convicted 10 or more years ago in the south. I worked for a short time at a law firm in New Orleans called ipno (innocence project New Orleans) which works to exonerate prisoners who are genuinely innocent. Most of those exonerated were prisoners of the exact prison referred to in this video clip, Angola. You can read about some of their cases on their website:
http://www.ip-no.org/cases.htm

I agree that there are probably plenty of guilty people in jail who do not deserve to see the light of day, but I would just like to encourage fellow BU students (and others who are posting on this blog) to do your research before you jump to conclusions. It’s easy, looking in from the outside, to point fingers and say these people deserve to be treated poorly. Once you sit and listen to an exonerated prisoner tell you about the time he spent in jail, what he did and what he thought about, how his family for years and years fought to collect evidence, and the struggles faced with re-entry into society you see these sorts of discussions/debates (those related to prisoners and their rights) in a slightly new light.

By: Jimson

Jimson — Thu, 27 Mar 2008 17:43:40 +0000

In regard to a previously made statement that in solitary confinement, prisoners have no chance to reflect I think that the point of solitary confinement is to provide prisoners with the means and times to reflect on their actions and seek forgiveness. Nonetheless, 36 years is a long time and perhaps the prisons should set up a regimented evaluation system so that as stated in the news clip they may eventually be transferred to different housing. People do change and should have the opportunity to show that they are deserving of a second chance.

The defense attorney in the video states that, “These men are a threat to no one”. They are quite obviously a threat if they somehow ended up in prison in the first place. However, since the bloody knife was not tied to either of them and the fingerprint did not match either inmate they should not be facing such a strict punishment whereas they have not been found guilty based on the evidence.

By: JesseR

JesseR — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:29:22 +0000

@Alex: I agree, and I’ve always been of the mind that inmates could be doing work instead of just sitting around doing whatever it is that prisoners do all day. Not to create a system of government-run sweatshops in America instead of China, but seriously I’d rather have inmates do the work (and get paid a wage) instead of children. When they get out they can have something on their resume, and earn even more money, thereby becoming productive members of society once again.

By: Jackie Hodgson

Jackie Hodgson — Wed, 26 Mar 2008 03:29:22 +0000

I don’t see how solitary confinement for any amount of time (especially 36 years!?) is humane. To me it seems like a form of torture, forcing somebody to live in a room the size of most bathrooms with no windows and taking away all human contact. I believe that prisons should focus on reforming prisoners lives through work and gaining economic benefit for society instead of shutting them off from all human contact.

By: Karim Saab

Karim Saab — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 16:16:30 +0000

I think that solitary confinement is one of the most effective ways to punish a prisoner. Although it seems that 36 years would surely drive the prisoner crazy.

It might even be safe to argue that such a long solitary confinement sentence can be worse than capital punishment.

By: Alex

Alex — Tue, 25 Mar 2008 03:46:05 +0000

the prison system is so backwards that this does not surprise me one bit. Human life is valuable-even if you are spending life in prison. Prison reform is valuing inmates and helping create a better society, but this situation seems to be ridiculous. How on earth can somebody justify solitary confinement for that long..I just can’t grasp that