Silver Called It

Karl Rove’s inability to acknowledge the facts on the ground in Ohio may be belief perseverance–“maintaining your original opinions in the face of overwhelming data that contradicts your beliefs.” (All of us–not just conservative Republicans–engage in it.) Yesterday he predicted Romney would win with 285 electoral votes to Obama’s 253.  In contrast the NY Times’ Nate Silver, who conducts state-by-state statistical analysis of all the major polls, predicted Obama would win with 314 electoral votes. (With Florida’s 29 electoral votes up in the air as of this writing Obama leads the electoral college 303 to 206.) Last Friday Silver reported that Obama’s chances of winning were better than 4 in 5 (83.7%, actually):

[The polls] represent powerful evidence against the idea that the race is a “tossup.” A tossup race isn’t likely to produce 19 leads for one candidate and one for the other — any more than a fair coin is likely to come up heads 19 times and tails just once in 20 tosses. (The probability of a fair coin doing so is about 1 chance in 50,000.)

Instead, Mr. Romney will have to hope that the coin isn’t fair, and instead has been weighted to Mr. Obama’s advantage. In other words, he’ll have to hope that the polls have been biased in Mr. Obama’s favor.

Silver explains that polls might provide an inaccurate election forecast due to statistical sampling error, voters changing their mind after the “snapshot in time” the poll represents, and statistical bias (“the polls are not taking an accurate sample of the voter population”). He states

The FiveThirtyEight forecast accounts for this possibility. Its estimates of the uncertainty in the race are based on how accurate the polls have been under real-world conditions since 1968, and not the idealized assumption that random sampling error alone accounts for entire reason for doubt.

In other words, either the polls on the Friday before the election show Obama is the odds-on favorite or they contain statistical bias outside the range Silver accounts for in his models.

5 thoughts on “Silver Called It

  1. Woah! I’m really loving the template/theme of this blog.
    It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s hard to get that “perfect balance” between superb usability and visual appearance.
    I must say you have done a awesome job with this. Also, the blog loads super fast for me on Opera.
    Outstanding Blog!

  2. Having read this I believed it was very informative.

    I appreciate you finding the time and effort to put this
    content together. I once again find myself personally spending
    a significant amount of time both reading and leaving comments.

    But so what, it was still worthwhile!

  3. It’s appropriate time to make a few plans for the long run and it is time to be happy.
    I have read this put up and if I may just I wish
    to suggest you few attention-grabbing issues or tips.
    Perhaps you can write next articles referring to this article.
    I want to read even more things approximately it!

  4. Silver definitely called it and I do not believe it was a difficult call. Obama’s influence is a strong as ever. Overall, it was a great campaign and race, and one to be remembered.

  5. Before the election, due to Obama’s influence on what were once thought of as minority races, and his ability to get these people to come to the polls and vote made him the clear favorite. The demographic of the US is changing as people have said for many years, and these “minorities” are finally having their voice heard through these last two elections. Yes the GOP is winning the majority of the White Middle Aged vote, but that isn’t enough. The GOP needs to evolve it’s platform to entertain some of the opinions supported by groups outside of their base and only then will they stand a chance in a general election.

Comments are closed.