RIAA Wins Jury Verdict

The RIAA sued Jammie Thomas of Brainerd, Minnesota for copyright infringement for sharing 24 songs through Kazaa. Unlike every one of the 26,000 other people the RIAA has sued since 2003 who settled for an average of $4,000, Thomas chose to fight the charges . Last week she lost after a two day trial, the jury returning its verdict and ordering Thomas to pay $222,000 in damages after deliberating for less than five hours. The RIAA chose to focus its case on 24 of the more than 1,700 songs it claimed were shared in February 2005 by Kazaa user Terrastar. Thomas claimed that although she has used the name Terrastar on the Internet, she did not share the songs at issue. Her denial did not convince the jury in the face of testimony that linked Terrastar’s IP address “and other identifying information” to Thomas’s computer and modem. Thomas claimed a hacker spoofed her identifying data and “offered her hard drive for inspection” after being notified of the suit, but the jury apparently believed expert testimony that the drive she offered for inspection had been installed after she was warned of the potential suit. Jurors set damages at $9,250 per song, far below the $150,000 per incident maximum statutory damages–or $3.6 million–allowed by the Copyright Act. An award of court costs and the RIAA’s attorneys’ fees could push Thomas’s total liability to $500,000. Thomas said “I’m not going to ask for financial help [but] if it comes, I’m not going to turn it down, either.”

The judge followed the RIAA’s definition of infringing activity, instructing the jury that it could find Thomas liable if she made copyrighted songs available for copying, sparing the need to find that someone actually copied the songs shared by Terrastar. Some have criticized this definition of infringement, which finds support in copyright law. Yesterday Thomas announced that she will appeal the verdict and argue that the judge erred in delivering these instructions to the jury.

Since it began these lawsuits in 2003 “the number of people sharing files online at any given time has risen 69 percent to almost 9.4 million.” (Sources: Star-Tribune.com, Excite News, c|net News.com, The New York Times)

6 Replies to “RIAA Wins Jury Verdict”

  1. Harrison

    Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging on blogs I stumbleupon every day.

    It will always be helpful to read content from
    other authors and practice a little something from other sites.

  2. Terran

    A lot of artists are starting to sell their songs on their own on the internet. I think radiohead and a few others following suit are letting the listeners offer their own prices for each song so that way the artist would get more of the profits.

  3. JesseR

    Statutory damages are set out in Title 17, Section 504 of the U.S. Code. The level of damages is between $750 and $30,000 per work (or per song in this case), though if ‘willfull infringement’ can be shown damages can go as high as $150K per infringement.
    However, defendants who can show they were not aware they were infringing copyright may have the damages reduced to $200 per work.

  4. sumonyr88

    how does one calculate the damages per song, is there a formulae? The individual in the case was brave in challenging the accusation – foolhardy almost.

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.